Why does a really well worn Fender from honest years of service look great while a well worn Gibson looks sad and neglected and even a little scary when it comes to setting it up or needing service?
I have great respect for both sides of the fence but as a guitar maker, I want to try and capture some of the aspects of why I feel the way I do about vintage Fenders. I know that a lot of people aren't going to have this perspective but a few might and maybe they can shed more light on what exactly I'm feeling here. I just look at a well used strat or telecaster as an instrument that wants to be played. They feel eager and friendly. To be honest, I'm not a talented guitarist but I know mojo when its on my bench. Is it the simplicity and lack of detailed craftsmanship? I try to put integrity into my guitars and the idea that they will still be great and cherished instruments in 50 years is a large part of my initial concepts. I want durability and the ability to age well. I'm not a fan of guitars that are made to look old and the silly practice of relicing.
What are some of the basic aspects of design, function, and finish, that lend toward what I'm describing? Maybe I'm having a senior moment
