Unorthodox X-bracing

Please put your pickup/wiring discussions in the Electronics section; and put discussions about repair issues, including fixing errors in new instruments, in the Repairs section.
Post Reply
Ferenc Kudasz
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 4:44 pm
Location: Budapest
Contact:

Unorthodox X-bracing

Post by Ferenc Kudasz »

Probably I am not the first to think about these variations in archtop bracing, however I have not met anyone mentioning it:
- One bracing is glued all along and the other overarching it in the middle
- Both braces form an arch above the middle area (although they are joined in the middle)
See schematic pictures.
x-brace single arch.jpg
x-brace double arch.JPG
Grey represents gluing surface, white is non-contact, bridge is marked with red.
It frees the middle area, mimicking a bit paralel bracing. Anyway, I do not start hypothetising the effect these options might have on the sound. I hope that someone has experienced with or read about it. Any remark is welcome.
Amateur
User avatar
Greg Robinson
Posts: 686
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 1:54 pm
Location: Coburg North, Victoria, Australia

Re: Unorthodox X-bracing

Post by Greg Robinson »

Hi Ferenc, welcome to the new MIMForum!
MIMForum staff member - Melbourne, Australia
Michael Lewis
Posts: 1474
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:22 am
Location: Northern California USA
Contact:

Re: Unorthodox X-bracing

Post by Michael Lewis »

a few years ago I used some bracing like this. In '98 I used bracing of this type for the very light back plate to good results. For tops I have used this style of brace for only 2 instruments. As long as the glue joints are strong there is no detrimental result that I know of. I leave one brace complete uncut, and the other brace is cut and fitted to join the first brace, then a "jumper" or cap of spruce is glued across the joint and smoothed nicely. It is very strong if the joints are well fitted and glued.

I can't say if there is much difference in sound produced but it is interesting to look at.
User avatar
Nelson Palen
Posts: 27
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 11:27 pm

Re: Unorthodox X-bracing

Post by Nelson Palen »

Michael Lewis wrote:a few years ago I used some bracing like this. In '98 I used bracing of this type for the very light back plate to good results. For tops I have used this style of brace for only 2 instruments. As long as the glue joints are strong there is no detrimental result that I know of. I leave one brace complete uncut, and the other brace is cut and fitted to join the first brace, then a "jumper" or cap of spruce is glued across the joint and smoothed nicely. It is very strong if the joints are well fitted and glued.

I can't say if there is much difference in sound produced but it is interesting to look at.
Michael, what were you trying to achieve with the "very light back plate" with bracing? Reduced feedback?
Louie Atienza
Posts: 275
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 1:35 pm

Re: Unorthodox X-bracing

Post by Louie Atienza »

Ken Parker's archtops have bracing that cross but do not touch each other...
Michael Lewis
Posts: 1474
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:22 am
Location: Northern California USA
Contact:

Re: Unorthodox X-bracing

Post by Michael Lewis »

Nelson, I was trying to make a very light instrument, and to that end I carved the back considerably thinner than usual and put in the bracing to stiffen the now floppy plate. It worked very well but the weight saving was not worth the effort. It looks really cool if you look in a sound hole.
Ferenc Kudasz
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 4:44 pm
Location: Budapest
Contact:

Re: Unorthodox X-bracing

Post by Ferenc Kudasz »

Thank you all for the comments and also for drawing my attention to Ken Parker's guitars. In the meantime I was also considering mixing somehow X-braces and parallel.
However, finally I decided to use traditional parallel bracing to focus on "projection".
Amateur
Post Reply

Return to “Archtop Guitars and Bass Guitars”