General Finishes Waterbase Topcoat - SM is pushing this - anyone tried it?

TEST ON SCRAP FIRST! If your question is about repair work, either regluing or refinishing, please post it in our Repair Section.
Chuck Tweedy
Posts: 1182
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 6:25 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: General Finishes Waterbase Topcoat - SM is pushing this - anyone tried it?

Post by Chuck Tweedy »

Hey yea, I tried the satin. It is real nice - real nice soft look. I'd really like to try a quick no-buff guitar finish with it some day...
Likes to drink Rosewood Juice
User avatar
Dan Smith
Posts: 346
Joined: Mon May 18, 2015 9:33 pm
Location: Texas

Re: General Finishes Waterbase Topcoat - SM is pushing this - anyone tried it?

Post by Dan Smith »

Peter Wilcox wrote:Excuse my confusion. It seems the original post was about this, https://generalfinishes.com/retail-prod ... lYYdr8Xt8E , the stuff SM sells, and then the topic switched to Endurovar, https://generalfinishes.com/retail-prod ... lYW_b8Xt8E . Does anybody know if they interchangeable in application and appearance for guitar finishing (except for the ambering?)
I'm lost too.
Exactly what product is this discussion about?
Thanks,
Dan
Ever-body was kung fu fight-in,
Them kids was fast as light-nin.
Chuck Tweedy
Posts: 1182
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 6:25 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: General Finishes Waterbase Topcoat - SM is pushing this - anyone tried it?

Post by Chuck Tweedy »

it is exactly about Endurovar :-)
i originally asked about General's "High Performance" coating, but was quickly re-directed by the wily and mischievous Mr. King (EDIT: Mr. Lewis - Mr. King just piled on) to the subject of Endurovar.
we've spent 10 pages on EV ... might want to just roll with it
Likes to drink Rosewood Juice
User avatar
Peter Wilcox
Posts: 1317
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 1:31 am
Location: Northeastern California

Re: General Finishes Waterbase Topcoat - SM is pushing this - anyone tried it?

Post by Peter Wilcox »

Dan, I'm building a resonator that I'm going to finish with the "High Performance Topcoat". It seems to have a few differences from the Endurovar besides the lack of amber tint.

Endurovar:
DURABILITY
Durability (Highest, High, Medium, Low): Medium
Hardness (Koeing): 123
Wear (Taber): 95.6 mg loss
Water (5 max): 3
Chemical (105 max): 84

High Performance:
DURABILITY
Durability (Highest, High, Medium, Low): High
Hardness (Koeing): 59
Wear (Taber): 34.4 mg loss
Water (5 max): 4
Chemical (105 max): 93

Seems it's more durable than Endurovar, but not as hard, so may be easier to sand. :)
Maybe I can't fix it, but I can fix it so no one can fix it
User avatar
Steve Sawyer
Posts: 965
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 2:20 pm
Location: Detroit, Michigan

Re: General Finishes Waterbase Topcoat - SM is pushing this - anyone tried it?

Post by Steve Sawyer »

Peter - interested in your experience. Just bought a can of High Performance intending to do a test finishing schedule. Will share results here when completed, but it might be a couple of weeks.
==Steve==
User avatar
Dan Smith
Posts: 346
Joined: Mon May 18, 2015 9:33 pm
Location: Texas

Re: General Finishes Waterbase Topcoat - SM is pushing this - anyone tried it?

Post by Dan Smith »

Thanks fellows!
I'm trying to get away from spraying nitro.
Dan
Ever-body was kung fu fight-in,
Them kids was fast as light-nin.
Todd Stock
Posts: 394
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 7:57 pm

Re: General Finishes Waterbase Topcoat - SM is pushing this - anyone tried it?

Post by Todd Stock »

Enduro-Var is not hard to sand or buff; not as soft as something like lacquer-based sanding sealer, but certainly not as tough as some polyesters. Fresh, quality abrasives, and change the paper when dry sanding...does not load if the finish has a few hours to cure.
David King
Posts: 2690
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 10:01 pm
Location: Portland, OR
Contact:

Re: General Finishes Waterbase Topcoat - SM is pushing this - anyone tried it?

Post by David King »

Endurovar was designed as a floor finish. It holds up Ok but not as well as an old school phenolic varnish or catalyzed oil finish.
It it resistant to alcohol and even acetone once it has cross-linked (after a week or so). I'd be curious to know if the High Performance is also resistant.
Todd Stock
Posts: 394
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 7:57 pm

Re: General Finishes Waterbase Topcoat - SM is pushing this - anyone tried it?

Post by Todd Stock »

Just finished a non-guitar project with High Performance - I liked it. Sanded and buffed three semi-gloss coats over a single coat of West 105/206 on curly maple. Gunned well and attachment to epoxy was quite good...sanded 48 hours after last coat and aggressively buffed to a semi-gloss finish. After 48 hours, the coupon was moderately resistant to Dalwhinnie 15 (not an intentional test) and lacquer thinner. Will see what happens next Tuesday with the remaining coupon. Def water white...absolutely no color, and (better yet) no blue cast with wet coats from a 1.0mm needle/cap set and the Fuji T-75G/4 stage turbine spraying filtered//unthinned.
David King
Posts: 2690
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 10:01 pm
Location: Portland, OR
Contact:

Re: General Finishes Waterbase Topcoat - SM is pushing this - anyone tried it?

Post by David King »

Thanks Todd!
Ideally the moderators would calve the High Performance off into it's own discussion.
The other question would be how well it's able to burn in between quickly spaced coats and whether sanding through leaves witness lines.

Actually the OP title indicates that we where supposed to be talking about HP all along.
User avatar
Dan Smith
Posts: 346
Joined: Mon May 18, 2015 9:33 pm
Location: Texas

Re: General Finishes Waterbase Topcoat - SM is pushing this - anyone tried it?

Post by Dan Smith »

Thanks Todd!
I may give it a try.
Dan
Ever-body was kung fu fight-in,
Them kids was fast as light-nin.
Todd Stock
Posts: 394
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 7:57 pm

Re: General Finishes Waterbase Topcoat - SM is pushing this - anyone tried it?

Post by Todd Stock »

No sanding between #1 and #2...there's probably a sweet spot for recoat without sanding, and it's likely longer than I waited (20 mins). No attachment or witness line issues, but more texture than I expected to see from the 1.0 mm needle/air cap set. May have been the lack of thinning - I wanted to see how it handles from the can. Had this been a gloss finish, I'd have needed another 2-3 coats to level sand for a dead flat surface, but at semi-gloss, three was plenty. Suspect this is similar to lacquer - just get the finish thickness needed and level sand for buffing.

For maple, the amber from the Enduro-Var might have been nice, but not having the bluing issue to deal with was nice in a WB.
Jason Rodgers
Posts: 1554
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 4:05 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: General Finishes Waterbase Topcoat - SM is pushing this - anyone tried it?

Post by Jason Rodgers »

I got a wee can of the HP that I'll be trying soon on a solidbody. Here's a question about seal coating. I use fish glue for all joints, and I've had the joint wake up when rubbing dye on raw wood thinned with water (sanded back immediately and switched to thinning with alcohol). If I brush on the HP, is that center seam going to swell and kill my beautiful results? Should I give it a spray of Zinsser's?
-Ruining perfectly good wood, one day at a time.
Brian Evans
Posts: 922
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2014 8:26 am
Location: Tatamagouche, Nova Scotia

Re: General Finishes Waterbase Topcoat - SM is pushing this - anyone tried it?

Post by Brian Evans »

According to the manufacturer, the recoat interval for HP is two hours with no sanding, and the recoat locks into what's already down. Sanding is required if the recoat interval is over 24 hours. That's different from the Stew-Mac schedule, which says three base coats at 90 minutes, colour coats the next day with no sanding, then top coats the next day after a 1000 grit sand. The Endurovar is designed as a brushable, the HP is designed as a wipe-on with a pad (typical for floors) or spray with a 1.3-ish nozzle without thinning. The two products look totally different in the can, so I don't think they are directly related to each other. Neither want to be applied over shellac, they have a special sanding sealer, if you use shellac you are supposed to sand it back to exposed wood. I suspect the wax in shellac is the thing they worry about, and dewaxed shellac would probably be OK. I also suspect the manufacturers instructions are as much to protect them from liability as anything else and that you can do all sorts of things with it and have good results. I've been researching this stuff for months and months, and I've decided that the only way to actually figure it out is start spraying...
Todd Stock
Posts: 394
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 7:57 pm

Re: General Finishes Waterbase Topcoat - SM is pushing this - anyone tried it?

Post by Todd Stock »

There will be settling over WB glue joints with both Enduro-Var and HP IME - the least amount on hot hide, more on Titebond and fish. Gone by the third coat IME with both. John Greven is using epoxy under EV, and it works under HP - def saves a few coats versus working from raw wood.
Brian Evans
Posts: 922
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2014 8:26 am
Location: Tatamagouche, Nova Scotia

Re: General Finishes Waterbase Topcoat - SM is pushing this - anyone tried it?

Post by Brian Evans »

Two questions - can I spray water-based finish at 55 degrees, or should I warm things up to 75 degrees? How the heck do you spray a clear finish when you can't see it as it goes on? I spray clear, and I can't tell if anything went on the wood. I am standing directly under two six foot, 100 watt flourescent bulbs in a well lit shop. Should I get some halogen side lights?

Thanks for answering the newbie's questions!

Brian
User avatar
Peter Wilcox
Posts: 1317
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 1:31 am
Location: Northeastern California

Re: General Finishes Waterbase Topcoat - SM is pushing this - anyone tried it?

Post by Peter Wilcox »

If you stand and spray so the image of a shop light is reflected in the work, you should be able to see the coat going on.
Maybe I can't fix it, but I can fix it so no one can fix it
Chuck Tweedy
Posts: 1182
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 6:25 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: General Finishes Waterbase Topcoat - SM is pushing this - anyone tried it?

Post by Chuck Tweedy »

Jason - Yes, the water-based finish will swell the fish glue!!
Watch out!!
Likes to drink Rosewood Juice
Todd Stock
Posts: 394
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 7:57 pm

Re: General Finishes Waterbase Topcoat - SM is pushing this - anyone tried it?

Post by Todd Stock »

One of my students found us a pretty decent deal on Enduro-Var Gloss gallons in time to handle a couple of necks and a body or two. Jet.Com (Walmart's rebranded web sales engine) has a 15% off deal for first three purchases, but capped at $30 total savings...so two gallons at about $150 total, versus the $185-$205 I pay from other sources. Runs thru Apr 1. Sort of like having a personal shopper ;)
Joel Nowland
Posts: 86
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 6:01 pm

Re: General Finishes Waterbase Topcoat - SM is pushing this - anyone tried it?

Post by Joel Nowland »

Just yesterday I watched a video featuring a famous jazz guitar builder in which he stated that all the water based finishes he has tried show glue lines.

I am going to stick with Mohawk lacquer which I started using only about three years ago and love it and wish I had used it twenty years ago.
Post Reply

Return to “Glues and Finishes”