neck/bridge radius

Please put your pickup/wiring discussions in the Electronics section; and put discussions about repair issues, including "disappearing" errors in new instruments, in the Repairs section.
Post Reply
Dave Tays
Posts: 15
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 11:23 pm

neck/bridge radius

Post by Dave Tays »

seen this on another forum but curious to what you have to say about it. should the bridge radius match the neck radius?
User avatar
Mark Swanson
Posts: 1991
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 11:11 am
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan USA
Contact:

Re: neck/bridge radius

Post by Mark Swanson »

I like to take each string individually, and not worry about an overall radius. When I get done they are radiused however but it doesn't exactly match the fingerboard. I like the action a bit higher as the string diameter increases.
  • Mark Swanson, guitarist, MIMForum Staff
Craig Bumgarner
Posts: 377
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 3:03 pm
Location: Drayden, Maryland

Re: neck/bridge radius

Post by Craig Bumgarner »

It is a matter of personal preference of course, but I like to think of the strings being concentric to the fingerboard and do whatever I need to the bridge to make it work like that. By concentric, I mean the strings are roughly equidistant to fingerboard and technically the strings would thus have a larger diameter radius than the fingerboard. Pretty minute difference, and using the same radius for both is a good place to start.

I find if I leave the bridge at exactly the same radius as the fingerboard, then the outer strings feel high to the fretting hand compared to the middle strings. This makes getting from one string to the next with the fretting hand more awkward.

I start with the bridge with the same radius as the FB, then like Mark, adjust on a string by string basis until it feels right. Like Mark says, the bass side tends to be a bit higher, though I seem to be doing less of that these days. For some reason, they are now within 0.1-0.2mm of each other most of the time.
Dave Locher
Posts: 155
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:56 pm

Re: neck/bridge radius

Post by Dave Locher »

I'm with Mark: I want the thicker strings much higher than the treble strings. If you look at my favorite bridges they have a much flatter radius on the three larger strings.
Dave Tays
Posts: 15
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 11:23 pm

Re: neck/bridge radius

Post by Dave Tays »

the reason i ask is i bought 14" rad locking roller bridge ( http://www.stewmac.com/shop/Bridges,_ta ... es#details) and i want a 12"rad neck. curious of what kind of problems i will be running into if any?
User avatar
Mark Swanson
Posts: 1991
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 11:11 am
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan USA
Contact:

Re: neck/bridge radius

Post by Mark Swanson »

I think you'll be just fine.
  • Mark Swanson, guitarist, MIMForum Staff
Henrique Schneiter
Posts: 98
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 12:59 am

Re: neck/bridge radius

Post by Henrique Schneiter »

Dave, in spite of agreeing to the previous comments (in theory), you may want try to match the radiuses the best you can. I have used this very bridge on a couple guitars, on one of them the neck has a 12" radius and on the other is 14". On the "matched" one I could get a slightly lower action.

My explanation to this is that the difference in radius is beneficial as the lower strings have a larger diameter, mass and excursion, but it should not be as big as 2". As you sand the radius on the neck you tend to tilt the sanding block a little and you actually sand a radius that's slightly narrower than the actual block, unless you have professional equipment.

Your guitar will work, though.
Post Reply

Return to “Solid-Body and Chambered or Semi-Solid Electric Guitars and Bass Guitars”